Skip navigation
Skip Navigation

Search
Click for menu... About NAEP... Click for menu... Subject Areas... Help Site Map Contact Us Glossary NewsFlash
Sample Questions Analyze Data State Profiles Publications Search the Site
Geography
The Nation's Report Card (home page)

Geography achievement-level results by student eligibility for the Free/Reduced-Price School Lunch program, grades 4, 8, and 12 (public and nonpublic schools combined): 2001

How to Read This Figure
Bullet The percentages shown to the right of the shaded bars represent the percentages of students at or above Basic and Proficient.
Bullet The percentages shown within the shaded bars represent the percentages of students within each achievement level (where the bar is too small, the percentage within the achievement level is presented, in parentheses, to the left of the bar).

Geography Achievement-Level Results by Student Eligibility for Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Program, Grades 4, 8 and 12 (Public and Nonpublic Schools Combined): 2001


View complete data with standard errors
for grade 4, grade 8, and grade 12.

 

 

# Percentage is between 0.0 and 0.5.
NOTE: NAEP reports assessment results in terms of student performance standards called "achievement levels," which are set by the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). The three levels for each grade are Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. See more information about the geography achievement levels.
Percentages within each geography achievement-level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding.
Results are based on administration procedures that did not permit accommodations.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2001 Geography Assessment.


Major Findings

  • At all three grades, the percentages of students at or above Basic and at or above Proficient were higher for students who were not eligible for the program than for those who were eligible.

  • At grade 8, the percentage of students at Advanced was higher for students who were not eligible for the program than for those who were eligible.

Return to national subgroup results page.

Return to main results.


Last updated 6 May 2002 (DSS)