Actual rates | Predicted rates | 2005–07 Change measure1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | 2005 | 2007 | 2007 | Change | Std error | |||
Atlanta | 66.9 | 41.8 | 62.2 | -20.4 | * | 7.42 | ||
Austin | 49.7 | 71.4 | 63.5 | 7.9 | 4.54 | |||
Boston | 76.7 | 75.0 | 77.7 | -2.8 | 3.98 | |||
Charlotte | 86.5 | 81.2 | 86.9 | -5.8 | 3.86 | |||
Chicago | 82.1 | 81.9 | 82.4 | -0.5 | 4.41 | |||
Cleveland | 34.0 | 27.2 | 42.1 | -14.9 | 9.31 | |||
District of Columbia | 62.1 | 33.6 | 59.7 | -26.1 | * | 3.09 | ||
Houston | 67.8 | 56.5 | 63.8 | -7.3 | 5.88 | |||
Los Angeles | 72.6 | 86.5 | 83.4 | 3.1 | 6.05 | |||
New York City | 90.0 | 93.4 | 91.5 | 1.9 | 3.05 | |||
San Diego | 78.4 | 70.2 | 80.6 | -10.4 | 7.64 | |||
* 2005–07 change over time is significantly different from zero (p < .05). | ||||||||
1 In the jurisdiction-specific approach, the change measure is, by construction, the difference between the 2007 actual and 2007 predicted rates. | ||||||||
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2005 and 2007 Reading Assessments. |
Read more about Measuring Status and Change in NAEP Inclusion Rates of Students with Disabilities: Trial Urban District Assessment 2005 to 2007.