District | All students | Non- accommodated students |
Difference (all students minus non- accommodated) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 6.2 | * | 4.5 | * | 1.7 |
Austin | 1.1 | 1.3 | -0.2 | ||
Boston | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.2 | ||
Charlotte | 0.8 | 2.8 | -2.0 | ||
Chicago | 2.1 | 2.7 | -0.6 | ||
Cleveland | 0.9 | 1.3 | -0.4 | ||
District of Columbia | 6.3 | * | 4.1 | * | 2.2 |
Houston1 | -5.0 | * | -4.5 | -0.6 | |
Los Angeles | 0.2 | 1.0 | -0.8 | ||
New York City | 0.1 | 3.3 | -3.3 | ||
San Diego | 2.4 | 3.2 | -0.8 | ||
* Statistically significant change. | |||||
1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different for nonaccommodated students alone. | |||||
NOTE: Differences are calculated using unrounded numbers. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 and 2007 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments. |
Read more about the relation of exclusion and accommodation rates to results.