| State/jurisdiction | Reported Sample | Full population estimates (FPE) |
Difference (Reported minus FPE) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama1 | -4.8 | * | -1.7 | -3.1 | |
| Arizona | -4.7 | * | -5.2 | * | 0.5 |
| Arkansas1 | 2.0 | 3.5 | * | -1.5 | |
| California | 7.6 | * | 7.6 | * | 0.0 |
| Connecticut | -0.7 | 2.4 | -3.1 | ||
| Georgia | 1.9 | 3.4 | -1.5 | ||
| Hawaii | 5.8 | * | 7.3 | * | -1.5 |
| Idaho | 0.1 | 1.0 | -0.9 | ||
| Illinois | -0.5 | 1.6 | -2.1 | ||
| Indiana | -4.0 | * | -4.0 | * | 0.0 |
| Kentucky | 3.2 | * | 3.4 | * | -0.2 |
| Louisiana | 4.2 | * | 4.3 | * | -0.1 |
| Maine | 0.0 | 0.3 | -0.3 | ||
| Maryland | -1.1 | -1.0 | -0.1 | ||
| Massachusetts1 | 3.0 | * | 2.7 | 0.3 | |
| Michigan | 0.1 | 0.9 | -0.8 | ||
| Minnesota | -1.1 | -1.1 | 0.0 | ||
| Mississippi | -1.5 | 0.8 | -2.3 | ||
| Missouri | 0.2 | 0.3 | -0.1 | ||
| Montana | -2.1 | -2.6 | 0.5 | ||
| Nevada1 | -2.8 | * | -1.9 | -0.9 | |
| New Mexico | -1.1 | -0.5 | -0.6 | ||
| North Carolina | -0.6 | 1.7 | -2.3 | ||
| North Dakota | 3.9 | * | 3.4 | * | 0.5 |
| Ohio | -3.8 | -3.9 | 0.1 | ||
| Oklahoma | -2.2 | -2.4 | 0.2 | ||
| Oregon | -0.7 | -0.4 | -0.3 | ||
| Rhode Island | -1.3 | -0.4 | -0.9 | ||
| South Carolina | 5.4 | * | 7.0 | * | -1.6 |
| Tennessee | -0.2 | 0.3 | -0.5 | ||
| Texas | 0.4 | 1.9 | -1.5 | ||
| Utah | -0.7 | -0.7 | 0.0 | ||
| Vermont | 3.2 | * | 2.9 | * | 0.3 |
| Virginia | 4.4 | * | 6.6 | * | -2.2 |
| West Virginia | 0.7 | 1.4 | -0.7 | ||
| Wyoming | 2.9 | * | 2.4 | * | 0.5 |
| DoDEA2 | 2.1 | * | 2.2 | * | -0.1 |
| * Statistically significant change. | |||||
| 1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different under the scenario. | |||||
| 2 Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). | |||||
| SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 and 2005 Science Assessments. | |||||
Read more about the potential effects of exclusion rates on assessment results.
