Comparison of change in average reading scores from 2003 to 2005 in the official NAEP reported sample and the full population estimates, grade 8: By state
| State/jurisdiction |
Reported sample |
|
Full population estimates (FPE) |
|
Difference (reported minus FPE) |
|
| Alabama |
-1.2 |
|
-0.6 |
|
-0.5 |
|
| Alaska |
2.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
-0.1 |
|
| Arizona |
-0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
-1.0 |
|
| Arkansas |
-0.3 |
|
-0.8 |
|
0.5 |
|
| California |
-0.6 |
|
-0.4 |
|
-0.2 |
|
| Colorado |
-2.8 |
|
-3.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
| Connecticut |
-3.2 |
|
-3.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
| Delaware |
1.5 |
|
1.0 |
|
0.5 |
|
| District of Columbia |
-0.5 |
|
0.0 |
|
-0.4 |
|
| Florida |
-1.5 |
|
-1.4 |
|
-0.1 |
|
| Georgia |
-0.8 |
|
-2.2 |
|
1.4 |
|
| Hawaii |
-2.8 |
* |
-2.6 |
* |
-0.2 |
|
| Idaho |
-0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
-0.2 |
|
| Illinois 1 |
-2.9 |
* |
-2.9 |
|
0.0 |
|
| Indiana |
-3.8 |
* |
-4.1 |
* |
0.3 |
|
| Iowa |
-0.5 |
|
-0.7 |
|
0.2 |
|
| Kansas |
0.8 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.3 |
|
| Kentucky |
-2.3 |
|
-2.8 |
|
0.5 |
|
| Louisiana |
-0.8 |
|
-2.9 |
|
2.1 |
|
| Maine |
1.7 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.1 |
|
| Maryland |
-0.8 |
|
-1.6 |
|
0.8 |
|
| Massachusetts |
0.8 |
|
-0.4 |
|
1.2 |
|
| Michigan |
-3.2 |
|
-3.3 |
|
0.0 |
|
| Minnesota |
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.1 |
|
| Mississippi |
-4.5 |
* |
-4.4 |
* |
-0.1 |
|
| Missouri |
-2.7 |
|
-2.8 |
|
0.1 |
|
| Montana |
-0.6 |
|
-0.9 |
|
0.3 |
|
| Nebraska |
1.1 |
|
1.8 |
|
-0.6 |
|
| Nevada |
0.6 |
|
-0.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
| New Hampshire |
-1.1 |
|
-0.7 |
|
-0.4 |
|
| New Jersey |
1.6 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.0 |
|
| New Mexico |
-0.6 |
|
-0.8 |
|
0.3 |
|
| New York |
-0.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
-0.2 |
|
| North Carolina |
-3.6 |
* |
-3.6 |
* |
0.0 |
|
| North Dakota |
0.5 |
|
-0.5 |
|
1.0 |
|
| Ohio |
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.2 |
|
| Oklahoma |
-2.1 |
|
-2.5 |
|
0.4 |
|
| Oregon |
-0.9 |
|
-0.7 |
|
-0.1 |
|
| Pennsylvania |
2.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
1.0 |
|
| Rhode Island |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.0 |
|
| South Carolina |
-0.9 |
|
-0.8 |
|
-0.1 |
|
| South Dakota |
-1.4 |
|
-1.7 |
|
0.3 |
|
| Tennessee |
1.0 |
|
-2.4 |
|
3.4 |
|
| Texas |
-0.6 |
|
-0.2 |
|
-0.4 |
|
| Utah |
-2.4 |
* |
-3.5 |
* |
1.1 |
|
| Vermont 1 |
-1.7 |
|
-2.2 |
* |
0.5 |
|
| Virginia |
-0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
-0.4 |
|
| Washington |
0.2 |
|
-0.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
| West Virginia |
-4.5 |
* |
-3.2 |
* |
-1.3 |
|
| Wisconsin |
-0.2 |
|
-0.9 |
|
0.6 |
|
| Wyoming |
1.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
| DoDEA 1, 2 |
-1.3 |
|
-2.0 |
* |
0.7 |
|
| * Statistically significant change. |
|
| 1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different under the scenario. |
|
| 2 Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). |
|
| SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Reading Assessments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read more about the potential effects of exclusion rates on assessment results.
Last updated 13 October 2005 (JM)
|
