DAS Website - NCES Pub No.2002167: Crosswalk




	Datasets: NPSAS:2000 Undergraduate Students Download All Files: 2002167.zip (151 KB)

Student Financing of Undergraduate Education: 1999-2000


Figure A	Percentage distribution of all undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2
		1_2a1
		1_2a2
		3_1a
		3_1b

Figure B	Percentage distribution of full-time, full-year undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2
		1_2a1
		1_2a2
		3_1a, 3_1b

Figure C	Average tuition, nontuition, and total price of attendance for full-time, full-year undergraduates, by type of institution attended: 1999–2000	1_9a, 1_9b 1_9c

Figure D	Percentage of all undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by type of institution attended: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2

Figure E	Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by source of funds: 1999–2000	1_2f, 1_2i 1_4a, 1_4b 3_3a, 3_3b 3_4a, 3_4b

Figure 1	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to aid package, percentage receiving different types of aid, and average amount of aid for aided students: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2
		1_2a1
		1_2a2
		3_1a, 3_1b

Figure 2	Average tuition, nontuition, and total price of attendance for full-time, full-year undergraduates, by type of institution attended: 1999–2000	1_9a, 1_9b 1_9c

Figure 3	Percentage of undergraduates receiving any aid and any loans and average amounts received by aided students, by price of attendance: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2
		1_2a1
		1_2a2

Figure 4	Percentage of dependent and independent undergraduates receiving any aid and any loans and average amounts received by aided students, by family income: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2
		1_2a1
		1_2a2

Figure 5	Percentage of all undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts receiving by aided students, by type of institution attended: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2

Figure 6	Percentage of full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving any aid, grants, or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by type of institution attended: 1999–2000	1_1a1
		1_1a2

Figure 7	Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants or loans and average amounts received by aided students, by source of funds: 1999–2000	1_2f, 1_2i 1_4a, 1_4b 3_3a, 3_3b 3_4a, 3_4b

Figure 8	Percentage of all dependent undergraduates receiving grants and average amounts received by aided students according to dependent family income, by source of grant funds: 1999–2000	1_2f
		1_1a1
		1_1a2

Figure 9	Percentage of all undergraduates receiving grants and average grant amount received by aided students according to type of institution, by source of grant funds: 1999–2000	1_2f
		1_1a1
		1_1a2

Figure 10	Percentage distribution of dependent and independent Stafford loan borrowers with subsidized loans, unsubsidized loans, or both according to Stafford combination and average loan amounts, by family income: 1999–2000	1_7a, 1_7b

Figure 11	Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: 1999–2000	1_1asp
		1_1b2
		1_2b1
		1_2b2
		1_3b, 1_9a 1_9b, 1_9c

Figure 12	Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: 1999–2000	1_1c1
		1_1c2
		1_2c1
		1_2c2
		1_3c, 1_9a 1_9b, 1_9c

Figure 13	Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: 1999–2000	1_1d1
		1_1d2
		1_2d1
		1_2d2
		1_3d, 1_9a 1_9b, 1_9c

Figure 14	Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions borrowing and receiving other aid: 1999–2000	1_1e1
		1_1e2
		1_2e1
		1_2e2
		1_3e, 1_9a 1_9b, 1_9c

Table 1.0	Percentage distribution (by columns) of undergraduates according to selected characteristics, by type of institution attended: 1999–2000	a, b, c, d, e f, g, h, i

Table 1.1-A	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amount received	1_1a1
		1_1a2

Table 1.1-B	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received	1_1asp
		1_1b2

Table 1.1-C	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received	1_1c1
		1_1c2

Table 1.1-D	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received	1_1d1
		1_1d2

Table 1.1-E	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in private for-profit institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any loans, and average amounts received	1_1e1
		1_1e2

Table 1.2-A	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received	1_2a1
		1_2a2

Table 1.2-B	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates in public 2-year institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received	1_2b1
		1_2b2

Table 1.2-C	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates in public 4-year institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received	1_2c1
		1_2c2

Table 1.2-D	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received	1_2d1
		1_2d2

Table 1.2-E	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates in private for-profit institutions and average amount of financial aid according to combinations of loans and other aid received	1_2e1
		1_2e2

Table 1.2-F	Percentage of all 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving grants and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds	1_2f

Table 1.2-G	Percentage of 1999–2000 full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds	1_2g

Table 1.2-H	Among all 1999–2000 undergraduates who received any grants, the percentage receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds	1_2h

Table 1.2-I	Among 1999–2000 full-time, full-year undergraduates who received any grants, the percentage receiving grants, and average grant amount, according to the source of grant funds	1_2i

Table 1.2-J	Percentage of all 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving aid and average aid amount, according to the source of aid funds	1_2j

Table 1.2-K	Percentage of 1999–2000 full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving aid, and average aid amount, according to the source of aid funds	1_2k

Table 1.3-A	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates who received a federal student loan in 1999–2000 or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics	1_3a

Table 1.3-B	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in public 2–year institutions who received a federal student loan in 1999–2000 or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics	1_3b

Table 1.3-C	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in public 4-year institutions who received a federal student loan in 1999–2000 or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics	1_3c

Table 1.3-D	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions who received a federal student loan in 1999–2000 or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics	1_3d

Table 1.3-E	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates in private for-profit institutions who received a federal student loan in 1999–2000 or ever received a federal student loan through 2000 and average amounts borrowed, by student characteristics	1_3e

Table 1.4-A	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving loans from various types of programs, by institutional and student characteristics	1_4a

Table 1.4-B	Average amount of loans received by 1999–2000 undergraduates from various types of programs, by institutional and student characteristics	1_4b

Table 1.5-A	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 federal student loan borrowers according to combinations of loans from various federal programs, by institutional and student characteristics	1_5a

Table 1.5-B	Average amount received by federal student loan borrowers in 1999–2000 according to combinations of loans from various federal programs, by institutional and student characteristics	1_5b

Table 1.6-A	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving any Stafford, any subsidized, and any unsubsidized loans, and average loan amounts, by institutional and student characteristics	1_6a

Table 1.6-B	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduate Stafford loan borrowers with subsidized and unsubsidized loans, and average loan amounts, by institutional and student characteristics	1_6b

Table 1.7	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates with Stafford loans according to subsidized and unsubsidized loan combinations and average loan amounts, by institutional and student characteristics	1_7a, 1_7b

Table 1.8-A	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving Stafford subsidized loans and average loan amounts according to subsidized maximum or less than maximum amounts borrowed, by institutional and student characteristics	1_8a1
		1_8a2
		1_8a3

Table 1.8-B	Percentage of 1999–2000 undergraduates receiving any Stafford loans and average loan amounts according to total maximum or less than maximum amounts borrowed, by institutional and student characteristics	1_8b1
		1_8b2
		1_8b3

Table 1.9	Average tuition and fees, nontuition expenses, and total price of attendance for 1999–2000 undergraduates, by type of institution and attendance status	1_9a, 1_9b 1_9c

Table 1.10	Percentage distribution of 1999–2000 undergraduates according to type of institution attended, by institutional and student characteristics	1_10

Table 2.1-A	Average total price of attendance according to type of institution, by institutional and type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	2_1a

Table 2.1-B	Average total price of attendance for full-time, full-year undergraduates according to institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	2_1b

Table 2.1-C	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to total price of attendance, by	2_1c

Table 2.2-A	Average tuition and fees for undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	2_2a

Table 2.2-B	Average tuition and fees for full-time, full-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	2_2b

Table 2.2-C	Average tuition and fees for part-time or part-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	2_2c

Table 2.2-D	Percentage distribution of all undergraduates according to tuition and fees, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	2_2d

Table 3.1-A	Percentage of undergraduates receiving aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_1a

Table 3.1-B	Average amount of aid received by aided undergraduates according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_1b

Table 3.1-C	Percentage of undergraduates receiving any aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_1c

Table 3.1-D	Average amount of total aid received by undergraduates who received any aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_1d

Table 3.2-A	Percentage of undergraduates receiving federal aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_2a

Table 3.2-B	Average amount of federal aid received by undergraduates who received federal aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_2b

Table 3.2-C	Percentage of undergraduates receiving federal aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_2c

Table 3.2-D	Average amount of federal aid received by undergraduates who received federal aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_2d

Table 3.3-A	Percentage of undergraduates receiving state aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_3a

Table 3.3-B	Average amount of state aid received by undergraduates who received state aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_3b

Table 3.3-C	Percentage of undergraduates receiving state aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_3c

Table 3.3-D	Average amount of state aid received by undergraduates who received state aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_3d

Table 3.4-A	Percentage of undergraduates receiving institutional aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_4a

Table 3.4-B	Average amount of institutional aid received by undergraduates who received institutional aid according to type of aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_4b

Table 3.4-C	Percentage of undergraduates receiving institutional aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_4c

Table 3.4-D	Average amount of institutional aid received by undergraduates who received institutional aid, by type of institution and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_4d

Table 3.5-A	Percentage distribution of aided undergraduates according to combination of financial aid received, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_5a

Table 3.5-B	Average amount of financial aid received by undergraduates who received various combinations of financial aid, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_5b

Table 3.6-A	Percentage of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving financial aid according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_6a

Table 3.6-B	Average amount of financial aid received by aided undergraduates in public 4-year institutions according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_6b

Table 3.7-A	Percentage of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving financial aid according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_7a

Table 3.7-B	Average amount of financial aid received by aided undergraduates in public 2-year institutions according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_7b

Table 3.8-A	Percentage of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving financial aid according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_8a

Table 3.8-B	Average amount of financial aid received by aided undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions according to type and source of aid, by student characteristics: 1999–2000	3_8b

Table 4.1-A	Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_1a

Table 4.1-B	Average total price of attendance less all grants among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_1b

Table 4.1-C	Average total price of attendance less federal grants among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_1c

Table 4.1-D	Average tuition and fees less grants among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_1d

Table 4.1-E	Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among dependent undergraduates according to dependent student family income, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_1e

Table 4.1-F	Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among independent undergraduates according to independent student income, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2001	4_1f

Table 4.1-G	Average net price (total price of attendance less total aid) of postsecondary education among full-time full-year undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_1g

Table 4.2	Average federal expected family contribution (EFC) among undergraduates according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_2

Table 4.3-A	Percentage of undergraduates with financial need for federal aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_3a

Table 4.3-B	Average financial need among undergraduates who have need according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_3b

Table 4.4-A	Percentage of undergraduates who have remaining financial need after receiving financial aid (if any) according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_4a

Table 4.4-B	Average amount of remaining financial need among undergraduates who have need after receiving financial aid (if any) according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_4b

Table 4.5-A	Percentage of undergraduates with need who received financial aid according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_5a

Table 4.5-B	Average amount of financial aid received by undergraduates who had need according to type of institution, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	4_5b

Table 5.1-A	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to dependency status, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_1a
		5_1a1
		5_1a2

Table 5.1-B	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to attendance pattern, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_1b

Table 5.1-C	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to local residence, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_1c

Table 5.2-A	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to race/ethnicity, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_2a1
		5_2a2

Table 5.2-B	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to gender and citizenship, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_2b1
		5_2b2

Table 5.3	Percentage distribution of dependent undergraduates according to parents' income, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_3

Table 5.4	Percentage distribution of independent undergraduates according to students' income, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_4

Table 5.5	Percentage distribution of undergraduates according to type of institution attended, by institutional and student characteristics: 1999–2000	5_5