Skip Navigation
DAS: Data Analysis System
DAS Online Application User Help Center Tables Library Analysis Reports What's New Home Page

back to report list
Report Info
View/download report

Datasets: 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty

Download All Files:
2002161.zip (31 KB)


Table Files: TPF/CPF

Teaching With Technology: Use of Telecommunications Technology by Postsecondary Instructional Faculty and Staff
Executive summary figures
Figure A Percentage of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who had access to the Internet, and who used e-mail and course-specific Websites, by employment status and institution type: Fall 1998

 t2_1, t2_2 t456_1 t456_2
Figure B Among postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used course-specific Websites, percentage using Websites for various teaching purposes, by employment status: Fall 1998

 t1011_1 t1011_2 t1011_3 t1011_4 t1011_5
Report figures
Figure 1 Percentage distribution of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff according to type of institution, by employment status: Fall 1998

 t1_1, t1_2 t1_3, t1_4 t1_5, t1_6 t1_7, t1_8 t1_9
Figure 2 Percentage of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff with Internet access, by employment status and institution type: Fall 1998

 t2_1, t2_2
Figure 3 Percentage distribution of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff according to quality of computing resources, by employment status and institution type: Fall 1998

 t3
Figure 4 Percentage of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used e-mail and course-specific Websites, by employment status and institution type: Fall 1998

 t456_1 t456_2
Figure 5 Among postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used course-specific Websites, percentage using Websites for various teaching purposes, by employment status: Fall 1998

 t1011_1 t1011_2 t1011_3 t1011_4 t1011_5
Report tables
Table F01 Percentage distribution of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff according to where they had access to the Internet, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t2_1, t2_2
Table1 Percentage distribution of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff according to selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t1_1, t1_2 t1_3, t1_4 t1_5, t1_6 t1_7, t1_8 t1_9
Table 2 Percentage distribution of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff according to where they had access to the Internet, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t2_1, t2_2
Table 3 Percentage distribution of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff according to quality of institution9s computing resources, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t3
Table 4 Percentage of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used e-mail and course-specific Websites, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t456_1 t456_2
Table 5 Percentage of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used e-mail and course-specific Websites, by access to the Internet: Fall 1998

 t456_1 t456_2
Table 6 Percentage of full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used e-mail and course-specific Websites, by institution9s quality of computing resources: Fall 1998

 t456_1 t456_2
Table 9 Among full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used e-mail to communicate with students, percentage of students using e-mail for course-specific communication and the average hours per week faculty spent responding to students' e-mail, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t9
Table 10 Among full-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used course-specific Websites, percentage using Website for specific teaching purposes, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t1011_1 t1011_2 t1011_3 t1011_4 t1011_5
Table 11 Among part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used course-specific Websites, percentage using Website for specific teaching purposes, by selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t1011_1 t1011_2 t1011_3 t1011_4 t1011_5
Table 12 Among full-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who taught classes for credit, average number of hours worked per week, and percentage distribution of time spent on professional activities, by use of e-mail and course-specific Websites and institution type: Fall 1998

 t1213_1 t1213_2 t1213_3 t1213_4
Table 13 Among part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who taught classes for credit, average number of hours worked per week, and percentage distribution of time spent on professional activities, by use of e-mail and course-specific Websites and institution type: Fall 1998

 t1213_1 t1213_2 t1213_3 t1213_4
Table 14 Among full- and part-time postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who taught classes for credit, total number of hours per week teaching classes, and average contact with students inside and outside of the classroom, by use of e-mail and course-specific Websites: Fall 1998

 t14
Multivariate tables
Table 7 Percentage of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used e-mail to communicate with students and adjusted percentage after taking into account the covariation of selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t7multi.cpf
Table 8 Percentage of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff who used course-specific Websites and the adjusted percentage after taking into account the covariation of selected demographic and academic characteristics: Fall 1998

 t8multi.cpf