DAS Website - NCES Pub No.2002155: Crosswalk




	Datasets: 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty Download All Files: 2002155.zip (79 KB)

Distance Education Instruction by Postsecondary Faculty and Staff: Fall 1998


1	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching distance education classes for credit, and number and percentage of such classes taught, by demographic characteristics: Fall 1998	t01
2	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching distance education classes for credit, and number and percentage of such classes taught, by employment and teaching characteristics: Fall 1998	t02
3	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching distance education classes for credit, and number and percentage of such classes taught, by education and experience: Fall 1998	t03
4	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching distance education classes for credit, and number and percentage of such classes taught, by computer and institutional characteristics: Fall 1998	t04
5	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching at least one for-credit class using non–face-to-face primary media, by demographic characteristics: Fall 1998	t05c1
		t05c2
		t05c3
		t05c4
6	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching at least one for-credit class using non–face-to-face primary media, by employment and teaching characteristics: Fall 1998	t06c1
		t06c2
		t06c3
		t06c4
7	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching at least one for-credit class using non–face-to-face primary media, by education and experience: Fall 1998	t07c1
		t07c2
		t07c3
		t07c4
8	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching at least one for-credit class using non–face-to-face primary media, by computer and institutional characteristics: Fall 1998	t08c1
		t08c2
		t08c3
		t08c4
9	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching any distance education classes and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	t09.cpf
10	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching any non–face-to-face classes and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	t10.cpf
11	Average teaching load of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t11
12	Percentage distribution of work hours of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions across various activities, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t12
13	Salary and other income of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Calendar year 1998	t13
14	Number of office hours and student contact hours per week among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t14
15	Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, extent of e-mail interaction with students, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t15c1
		t15c2_3
16	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions using various assessment practices in any for-credit classes, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t16
17	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions using class-specific Websites, and of those, percentage using Websites to post various items, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t17c1
		t17c2
		t17c3
		t17c4
		t17c5
		t17c6
18	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions who reported they were very satisfied with various aspects of their jobs, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t18
19	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff agreeing with various statements about the institutional climate, by whether they taught for-credit distance classes and employment status: Fall 1998	t19
B1	Standard errors for table 3: Among instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, percentage teaching distance education classes for credit, and number and percentage of such classes taught, by education and experience: Fall 1998	t01
C1	Number of for-credit classes taught by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted number after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C2	Number of for-credit classes taught by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted number after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C3	Number of course preparations taught by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted number after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C4	Number of course preparations taught by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted number after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C5	Average percentage of time spent on research by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C6	Average percentage of time spent on research by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C7	Average percentage of time spent on service and other activities by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C8	Average percentage of time spent on service and other activities by instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught on–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C9	Base salary of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted amount after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Calendar year 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C10	Base salary of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted amount after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Calendar year 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C11	Other institutional income of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted amount after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Calendar year 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C12	Other institutional income of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted amount after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Calendar year 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C13	Student contact hours per week of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted hours after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C14	Student contact hours per week of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted hours after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c01_c14 c01_c18.cpf
C15	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions who communicated with students by e-mail, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c15_c16 c01_c18.cpf
C16	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions who communicated with students by e-mail, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c15_c16 c01_c18.cpf
C17	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions who used Websites for their classes, by whether they taught distance education classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c17_c18 c01_c18.cpf
C18	Percentage of instructional faculty and staff at degree-granting institutions who used Websites for their classes, by whether they taught non–face-to-face classes and other factors, and the adjusted percentage after controlling for covariation of the variables listed in the table: Fall 1998	c17_c18 c01_c18.cpf